Services
Christian School Strategic Planning
Strategic planning at True North is a short, honest plan the board actually uses, built around the mission instead of around the fear. It starts with three numbers, it gets checked every month against three documents, and it names who owns what. I have spent fifty years in education and helped turn around six schools. Most of the schools I was called into had never had a real strategic plan, because survival mode does not plan. It reacts. This page is how a Christian school stops reacting and starts planning.
Fifty years in education. Six turnarounds.
Quick Facts
- What it is:
- A plan the board actually uses, built around the mission instead of around the fear.
- Where it starts:
- The Three Numbers: the last two years of 990s, the student retention rate, and the faculty and staff retention rate.
- How it gets watched:
- The Monthly Three. A detailed P&L, a cash forecast through year end, and a balance sheet, every month, at every board meeting.
- What skipping it costs:
- One board panicked and turned a $200,000 problem into a $400,000 problem.
- Where it worked:
- Turlock Christian School wrote its first strategic plan in the middle of a turnaround.
- How it is offered:
- Strategic planning is part of the School Development Partnership, $4,000 a month.
Why Diagnose Before You Plan?
Because a plan built on a wrong diagnosis is a very organized way to fix the wrong thing. I have watched schools write goals about marketing and buildings while the real problem walked out the door every June.
So before anybody writes a goal, I ask for three numbers. Your last two years of 990s. Your student retention percentage. And your faculty and staff retention percentage. Not faculty alone. Faculty and staff.
Read together, they tell me whether a plan should be about growth or about repair. The third one is the number people skip, and it is the one that matters most. A revolving door of staff is the death-spiral tell, and it shows up in the retention number long before it shows up in the budget. If that number is bad, the first page of your plan is about people, whatever the board thought the plan was going to be about. The Three Numbers are the foundation every plan I help write sits on.
Is Your Problem About Money?
Usually it looks that way. It almost never is. This is the Causality Doctrine, and it is the most useful sentence I can give a board sitting down to plan: money problems do not cause your problems. They reveal them.
The sequence runs the same way at school after school. The mission drifts or the leadership falters. The faculty feel it first, and the good ones start leaving. Families feel the turnover and leave too. Enrollment falls, and now the budget has a hole in it. So when the board finally sees a money problem, the plan has to reach back three dominoes to where it started.
A plan that starts at the fourth domino becomes a list of cuts. A plan that starts at the first domino fixes the thing that caused the cuts. I have watched boards make that mistake more than once. One panicked and turned a $200,000 problem into a $400,000 problem. So when a board tells me its plan is about money, I ask about the first three dominoes, and that is where the plan begins. If the money side needs its own work, that lives in financial stewardship.
If you are not sure which domino fell first at your school, Get My School Health Check before the board writes a single goal.
Who Owns the Plan: the Board or the Head?
Both, and they own different halves. That is the Three Roles applied to planning. A board has three jobs: guard the mission, vision, and values; encourage and evaluate the head of school; and own fiduciary responsibility. Everything else is meddling.
So the board owns the why of the plan and the money behind it. It decides what the school is for and whether the school can afford what the plan asks. The head owns the how. The head runs the plan, day to day, with the staff, and reports on it in the boardroom.
When those halves cross, the plan dies. A board that starts managing the action items is meddling, and the head stops leading. A head who writes the plan alone and hands it to the board for a vote has a document nobody on the board will defend when it gets hard. The best plans I have seen were argued out together, then split cleanly: the board guards it, the head runs it. If your board is not clear on its own three jobs yet, start with board governance before you plan.
What Does a Mission-First Plan Look Like?
It answers one question before any other: what is this school for? Then every goal in the plan has to show how it serves that answer.
A fear-first plan is easy to spot. Every goal is about getting enrollment back, cutting a cost, or surviving the next year. The mission shows up in the opening paragraph and then never again. Fear plans feel urgent and accomplish very little, because fear makes people grab at whatever is closest.
Here is the honest test I give boards. Can every member state the mission without reading it? Does the plan test its big decisions against the mission out loud? If the answer is no, the plan is not about the mission yet, no matter what the cover page says.
A mission-first plan still has hard numbers in it. They serve the mission instead of replacing it. Nehemiah did not rebuild the wall because he was afraid of the neighbors. He rebuilt it because Jerusalem was worth rebuilding, and then he posted a guard because the neighbors were real. Mission first, then guard the work.
Want to know whether your school is planning from mission or from fear? Ask Paul Your Hardest Question.
Related: Start a Christian School
Why Does One Page Beat a Binder?
Because nobody opens the binder. A thick document nobody reads is not a plan. It is a receipt.
The plan I help schools build fits where people will look at it. A handful of priorities, each one tied to the mission, each one with an owner, and each one with a number that tells you whether it is working. If the head cannot carry it into a board meeting and walk through it in a few minutes, it is too long.
Short is harder, not easier. You have to decide what the school is not going to do this year, and that decision is the real work of planning.
How Do You Keep the Plan Alive Every Month?
You tie it to the Monthly Three. Every month, the board and the head look at a detailed P&L, a cash forecast through the end of the year, and a balance sheet. Not quarterly summaries. The three documents, every month, at every board meeting.
The plan rides alongside them. A good rhythm: give each priority a line in the meeting, marked on track, slipping, or stuck. The money tells you whether the plan is affordable. The plan tells you whether the money serves the mission. A board that sees both monthly does not get surprised in March.
One rule rides with this, and it saves schools: do not add a program and then go raise money to pay for it. If a priority in the plan needs money the school does not have yet, the money comes first and the program comes second. Add-then-raise is the lie that murders morale. Live within your means. It is good for a couple, and it is good for a school.
How Often Should a School Revisit Its Plan?
Every month in a short check, and once a year in a real one. The monthly check is the line-by-line in the board meeting. The yearly check goes back to the beginning: pull the three numbers again, ask whether the mission is still driving the plan, and decide what comes off the list and what goes on.
A plan that never changes is a plan nobody is using. A plan that changes every month is a plan nobody believes. Annual revision, monthly attention. That rhythm keeps it honest.
Schools coming out of a crisis need this rhythm most. In a turnaround, the first plan is how a school learns it has a future. The board that spent a year staring at one hard deadline starts arguing about year three, and that argument is the sound of a turnaround finishing.
How True North Works on Strategic Planning
Diagnosis first: the Three Numbers, honest conversations with the head, the board, and the staff, and finding the first domino. Then the plan itself, written with the board and the head together, built around the mission, and short enough to use. Then the rhythm: the plan installed next to the Monthly Three, with the board guarding it and the head running it.
Strategic planning is part of the School Development Partnership, $4,000 a month, alongside board governance, head of school development, and implementation support. That last piece matters. I do not hand a school a plan and leave. I stay in the room while the plan gets implemented, because a plan without implementation is the binder again. At Turlock Christian School, the first strategic plan was written alongside a rebuilt board, and it is part of why that school has a future to plan for.
Want to know who you would be working with? Read Paul's story.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is strategic planning for a Christian school?
It is deciding what the school is for, what it will do about that in the next few years, and who owns each piece. At True North it starts with the Three Numbers, gets built around the mission instead of around the fear, and gets checked every month against the Monthly Three so it stays a working document instead of a shelf ornament.
What should a school do before writing a strategic plan?
Pull three numbers: the last two years of 990s, the student retention percentage, and the faculty and staff retention percentage. Those show whether the school is healthy or upside down, and they decide what the first page of the plan is about. Run all three with the School Health Check before your board starts writing goals.
Who should own a Christian school's strategic plan?
The board owns the mission and the money behind the plan, which are two of its three roles. The head of school runs the plan day to day and reports on it in the boardroom. When the board starts managing action items, that is meddling, and the head stops leading. Argue it out together, then split the ownership cleanly.
How long should a strategic plan be?
Short enough that the head can walk the board through it in a few minutes. A handful of priorities, each tied to the mission, each with an owner and a number that shows whether it is working. A plan nobody can name three things from is a receipt, not a plan. Writing fewer priorities is harder work, and it is the real work.
How often should a school review its strategic plan?
Monthly in a short check, alongside the Monthly Three at every board meeting: each priority on track, slipping, or stuck. Once a year in a full review: pull the three numbers again, test the plan against the mission, and decide what comes off the list. A plan that never changes is not being used. A plan that changes monthly is not believed.
Does True North write the plan for us?
No. The plan gets written with your board and your head together, because a plan written by an outsider is a plan nobody on the inside will defend when it gets hard. I lead the diagnosis, run the process, and stay for implementation. Strategic planning is part of the School Development Partnership. Request a Conversation to see whether it fits.
Next step
A Plan Is a Promise You Keep Every Month
Three numbers to tell you where you stand. Three roles to tell you who owns what. Three documents every month to tell you whether it is working. Build it around the mission, keep it short, and look at it every month. That is the whole discipline.
A first call with me covers three things: what your three numbers say about where your school stands, whether the plan you have now is driving decisions or sitting on a shelf, and whether a new plan is the next right step or something else has to be fixed first.
